Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
38.9Performance27.1
73.9Display34.4
54.7Camera30.1
57.2Battery43.7
73.3Features49.3
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+40) and camera (+25). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 34
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 57 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- 25% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 96 % vs 77 %
- 25% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+309% | 733 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| AnTuTu | — | 510,132Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 211,597Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,559Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,374Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,602Bottom 2% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+154%Top 39% | 728Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+138%Top 41% | 1,943Bottom 13% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | 96 %+25%Top 47% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 5 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+5% | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+10% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP54 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs HONOR X6cVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs OnePlus N6xVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs realme C63VS