Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
38.9Performance27.1
73.9Display36.6
54.7Camera30.1
57.2Battery55.7
73.3Features65.3
17 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+37) and camera (+25). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 30
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 65
- 275% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 800 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- 25% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $199 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 85.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| AnTuTu | — | 509,232Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 210,242Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,774Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,272Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,944Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+150%Top 39% | 740Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+126%Top 41% | 2,050Bottom 20% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 5 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x+100% | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h+1% | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+5% | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+10% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP54 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs vivo Y600iVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs POCO M6 Plus 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Lava Play Ultra 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs HONOR X7eVS