Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
38.9Performance27
73.9Display36.4
54.7Camera41.9
57.2Battery43.7
73.3Features38.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 36.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+38) and features (+35). Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 57 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 25% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $249 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+6% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2340x1080 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+4% | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| AnTuTu | — | 555,354 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+153%Top 39% | 730Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+130%Top 41% | 2,010Bottom 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 5 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+3% | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+15% | 8.3 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs OPPO A60VSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs HONOR X6eVSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs Motorola Moto G (2025)VSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs POCO C85 5GVS