Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
38.9Performance20
73.9Display36
54.7Camera33.1
57.2Battery38.8
73.3Features38.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+38) and features (+35). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 57 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 25% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+8% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| AnTuTu | — | 260,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+351%Top 39% | 410Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+251%Top 41% | 1,320Bottom 2% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+60% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+200% | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 184 g+3% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+16% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVS