Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
38.9Performance34.7
73.9Display46.2
54.7Camera41.7
57.2Battery52.5
73.3Features89.3
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 47.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+28) and camera (+13). Samsung Galaxy A36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 35
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 57 vs 53
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Stronger features score: 89 vs 73
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- 25% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $400 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+150% | 1,200 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTu | — | 816,934Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 304,148Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 133,245Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 150,052Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,489Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+82%Top 39% | 1,016Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+60%Top 41% | 2,902Bottom 35% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+3% | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+4% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVS