Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A52
38.9Performance23.1
73.9Display35.6
54.7Camera48.4
57.2Battery39
73.3Features54.7
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A52
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in display (+38) and features (+19). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 48
- Stronger battery score: 57 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 55
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 13% higher capacity: 4,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+6% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+2% | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 720G |
| AnTuTu | — | 395,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+153%Top 39% | 730Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+144%Top 41% | 1,900Bottom 12% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128GB / 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh+13% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+16% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme C75VSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Huawei P30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme 14x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Redmi 17C 5GVS