Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A56
38.9Performance42.5
73.9Display48.5
54.7Camera42.6
57.2Battery58.2
73.3Features89.3
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A56
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+25) and camera (+12). Samsung Galaxy A56 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 49
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 43
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 150% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A56
- Stronger performance score: 43 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 89 vs 73
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- 25% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- Lower launch price: $499 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+150% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 87.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,227,862Bottom 42% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 466,860Bottom 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 292,734Bottom 44% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 171,100Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 297,168Bottom 41% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848+37%Top 39% | 1,350Top 49% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630+19%Top 41% | 3,900Top 48% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h+10% | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+5% | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+4% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs POCO F6VSSamsung Galaxy A56vs REDMI Note 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs iPhone 14 ProVS