Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
38.9Performance79.3
73.9Display63.6
54.7Camera47.3
57.2Battery54.2
73.3Features94.7
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25+
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25+ wins this phone face-off, 66.3 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+40) and features (+21). Motorola Razr 50 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 64
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 57 vs 54
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Stronger performance score: 79 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 119% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,153 vs 4,630
- 70% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,141 vs 1,848
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 513 ppi+24% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,763,072Top 22% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 866,625Top 16% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 996,402Top 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,621Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 552,424Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | 3,141+70%Top 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | 10,153+119%Top 7% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3 x+50% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,900 mAh+23% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+1% | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+3% | 7.3 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs Infinix Note 60 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs OPPO Reno15 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs Huawei Pura X MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs iPhone 16 Pro MaxVS