Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26
38.9Performance81
73.9Display60
54.7Camera47.3
57.2Battery62.1
73.3Features94.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S26 wins this phone face-off, 67.7 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and features (+21). Motorola Razr 50 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 47
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26
- Stronger performance score: 81 vs 39
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 57
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 134% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 4,630
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $900 vs $1,000
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+10% | 6.3 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, China and Japan) |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,064,672 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | 2,995+62%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | 10,824+134%Top 4% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256GB/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3 x+50% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,300 mAh+8% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | 15.3 h+26% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 167 g+12% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+2% | 7.2 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum 2 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S26vs vivo X200 FEVSSamsung Galaxy S26vs REDMI K80 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26vs Nothing Phone (3)VSSamsung Galaxy S26vs Vivo X300 EVS