Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
38.9Performance77.6
73.9Display59.2
54.7Camera42.1
57.2Battery59.7
73.3Features94.7
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 wins this phone face-off, 64.9 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+39) and features (+21). Motorola Razr 50 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 104% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 77 % vs 38 %
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $1,200
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
- Stronger performance score: 78 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- 126% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,466 vs 4,630
- 61% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,977 vs 1,848
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2520 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+3% | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 87.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, Canada and China) |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,477,554 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | 2,977+61%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | 10,466+126%Top 5% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %+104%Bottom 45% | 38 %Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256GB/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,300 mAh+8% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | 14.2 h+17% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 180 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+46% | 13.1 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs realme 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 70 FusionVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 50 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Huawei nova 14 UltraVS