Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
38.9Performance28.9
73.9Display73
54.7Camera34.1
57.2Battery62.4
73.3Features49.3
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra4 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in features (+24) and camera (+21). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 34
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 57
- 40% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- 33% higher Wired charging: 60 W vs 45 W
- 10% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.1 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1224x2720 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 440 ppi+7% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 87.7 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,600 mAh+40% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W+33% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.4 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 16 (HiOS 16.2) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Honor 90VSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVS