Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
38.9Performance28.9
73.9Display74.2
54.7Camera45.9
57.2Battery61.9
73.3Features65.3
3 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra4 spec wins — TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 56.2 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+10) and camera (+9). TECNO CAMON Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 39 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 46
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 65
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 57
- 50% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
- 10% lower weight: 171 g vs 189 g
- 10% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.1 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 429 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %Bottom 45% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+50% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 171 g+10% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.4 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs POCO F6VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs REDMI Note 15 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A56VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs iPhone 14 ProVS