Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs vivo X200 FE
38.9Performance51.2
73.9Display76.3
54.7Camera60.5
57.2Battery85.5
73.3Features78.7
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra12 spec wins — vivo X200 FE
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 FE wins this phone face-off, 67.7 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+28) and performance (+12). Motorola Razr 50 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 28% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 77 % vs 60 %
- 11% lower thickness: 7.1 mm vs 8 mm
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE
- Stronger performance score: 51 vs 39
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 86 vs 57
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 100% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 45 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+9% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 460 ppi+11% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 5,000 nits+67% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | 1,960+6%Top 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | 6,606+43%Top 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %+28%Bottom 45% | 60 %Bottom 22% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.88 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3 x+50% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh+63% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | 15.3 h+26% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 186 g+2% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+11% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSvivo X200 FEvs Samsung Galaxy S26VSvivo X200 FEvs REDMI K80 UltraVSvivo X200 FEvs Nothing Phone (3)VSvivo X200 FEvs Vivo X300 EVS

