Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs vivo X200 Pro mini
38.9Performance71.3
73.9Display73.8
54.7Camera65.5
57.2Battery74.7
73.3Features86.7
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr 50 Ultra10 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+32) and battery (+18). Motorola Razr 50 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 59% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 77 % vs 48 %
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 13% lower thickness: 7.1 mm vs 8.2 mm
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 39
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 57
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
- 100% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 45 W
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+9% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 460 ppi+11% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,848Top 39% | 2,589+40%Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,630Top 41% | 8,078+74%Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 77 %+59%Bottom 45% | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 2 x | 3 x+50% |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh+43% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | 12.1 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g+1% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+13% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50 Ultravs Google Pixel 9VSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs OPPO F31 Pro+ 5GVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs HONOR Magic8 LiteVSMotorola Razr 50 Ultravs TECNO POVA 7 Pro 5GVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS