Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

WINNER
Motorola Razr 50

Motorola

Motorola Razr 50

$700

44.7Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
25.4Performance27.1
60.2Display34.4
47Camera30.1
41.5Battery43.7
73.3Features49.3
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr 502 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr 50 wins this phone face-off, 44.7 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+26) and features (+24). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50

  • Stronger display score: 60 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 47 vs 30
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
  • 309% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 733 nits
  • 160% higher ultra-wide: 13 MP vs 5 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
  • 19% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Screen size6.9 ″+3%6.7 ″
Panel typeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1080x26401080x2340
Pixel density413 ppi+7%385 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits+309%733 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300XMediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu—510,132Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—211,597Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—43,559Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—110,374Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—144,602Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,054+45%Bottom 39%728Bottom 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,022+56%Bottom 41%1,943Bottom 13%
Wild Life Extreme stability—96 %Top 47%
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256GB/512GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Ultra-wide13 MP+160%5 MP
Max video4K@30fps1080p@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Capacity4,200 mAh5,000 mAh+19%
Wired charging30 W+20%25 W
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Weight188 g+6%200 g
Thickness7.3 mm+8%7.9 mm
IP ratingIPX8IP54
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge3 years6 years+100%

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr 50 versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr 50Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup