Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
25.4Performance20
60.2Display36
47Camera33.1
41.5Battery38.8
73.3Features38.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr 505 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 50 wins this phone face-off, 44.7 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+24). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- Stronger performance score: 25 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 47 vs 33
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
- 275% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 800 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 19% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $700
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+8% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| AnTuTu | — | 260,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054+157%Bottom 39% | 410Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022+129%Bottom 41% | 1,320Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+60% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g | 184 g+2% |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+14% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50vs iPhone 14VSMotorola Razr 50vs OnePlus Nord CE4VSMotorola Razr 50vs realme C85 5GVSMotorola Razr 50vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVS