Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A35
25.4Performance31.4
60.2Display45.3
47Camera41.9
41.5Battery55.7
73.3Features70.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr 502 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr 50 scores 44.7 against 45.1 for Samsung Galaxy A35. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy A35 edges ahead in battery and performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 47 vs 42
- 200% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
- 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
- 63% higher ultra-wide: 13 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- Stronger performance score: 31 vs 25
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 42
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 19% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $700
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+6% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTu | — | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054Bottom 39% | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022+2%Bottom 41% | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+10% | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50vs iPhone 14VSMotorola Razr 50vs OnePlus Nord CE4VSMotorola Razr 50vs realme C85 5GVSMotorola Razr 50vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS