Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
25.4Performance34.7
60.2Display46.2
47Camera41.7
41.5Battery52.5
73.3Features89.3
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr 503 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy A36 5G wins this phone face-off, 47.4 to 44.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+16) and battery (+11). Motorola Razr 50 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 47 vs 42
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 150% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- 63% higher ultra-wide: 13 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Stronger performance score: 35 vs 25
- Stronger battery score: 53 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 89 vs 73
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
- Lower launch price: $400 vs $700
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+150% | 1,200 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTu | — | 816,934Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 304,148Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 133,245Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 150,052Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,489Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054+4%Bottom 39% | 1,016Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022+4%Bottom 41% | 2,902Bottom 35% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+4% | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+2% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50vs iPhone 14VSMotorola Razr 50vs OnePlus Nord CE4VSMotorola Razr 50vs realme C85 5GVSMotorola Razr 50vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVS