Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy A55
25.4Performance37.9
60.2Display46.1
47Camera46.8
41.5Battery52.7
73.3Features78.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr 504 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A55
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy A55 wins this phone face-off, 48.4 to 44.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+13) and battery (+11). Motorola Razr 50 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 46
- 200% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
- 20% higher Wired charging: 30 W vs 25 W
- 12% lower weight: 188 g vs 213 g
- 12% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.2 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A55
- Stronger performance score: 38 vs 25
- Stronger battery score: 53 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 19% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh
- Lower launch price: $449 vs $700
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+6% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 85.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
| AnTuTu | — | 997,950Bottom 40% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 353,082Bottom 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 224,206Bottom 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 162,521Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 258,141Bottom 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054Bottom 39% | 1,150+9%Bottom 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022Bottom 41% | 3,400+13%Bottom 48% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+8% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+12% | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50vs iPhone 14VSMotorola Razr 50vs OnePlus Nord CE4VSMotorola Razr 50vs realme C85 5GVSMotorola Razr 50vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs OPPO F33 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs Redmi Note 13 Pro (4G)VSSamsung Galaxy A55vs iQOO Z9x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+VS