Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
25.4Performance54.3
60.2Display59.7
47Camera69.9
41.5Battery62.8
73.3Features78.7
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr 507 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 62.6 to 44.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+29) and camera (+23). Motorola Razr 50 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 71% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,750 nits
- 20% lower weight: 188 g vs 234 g
- 19% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.9 mm
- Lower launch price: $700 vs $1,200
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 54 vs 25
- Stronger camera score: 70 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 63 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+1% | 6.8 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3088 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 501 ppi+21% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+71% | 1,750 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,677,954Bottom 50% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 550,163Bottom 51% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 416,322Bottom 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 277,973Bottom 51% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 433,496Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054Bottom 39% | 2,000+90%Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022Bottom 41% | 5,400+79%Top 34% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+8% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 10 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+20% | 234 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+19% | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 50vs iPhone 14VSMotorola Razr 50vs OnePlus Nord CE4VSMotorola Razr 50vs realme C85 5GVSMotorola Razr 50vs Samsung Galaxy A54 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Xiaomi 13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Huawei Mate 70 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Huawei Mate XTs Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs realme 16 Pro+ 5GVS