Motorola Razr 50 vs Samsung Galaxy S25
25.4Performance75.3
60.2Display61.3
47Camera47.3
41.5Battery51.4
73.3Features94.7
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr 506 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 wins this phone face-off, 64.1 to 44.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+50) and features (+21). Motorola Razr 50 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 50
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 20% higher Wired charging: 30 W vs 25 W
- 15% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits
- 11% higher Screen size: 6.9 ″ vs 6.2 ″
- Lower launch price: $700 vs $800
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 25
- Stronger battery score: 51 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 211% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 9,400 vs 3,022
- 180% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 1,054
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+11% | 6.2 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 416 ppi+1% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,578,555Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 792,959Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 925,248Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 331,698Top 33% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 528,650Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,054Bottom 39% | 2,950+180%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,022Bottom 41% | 9,400+211%Top 12% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 128/256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+8% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,200 mAh+5% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g | 162 g+14% |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.2 mm+1% |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 50 | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |