Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
67.3Performance27.1
81.6Display34.4
58.6Camera30.1
75.5Battery43.7
73.3Features49.3
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+47) and performance (+40). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 34
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+21% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+514% | 733 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| AnTuTu | — | 510,132Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 211,597Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,559Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,374Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,602Bottom 2% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+310%Top 14% | 728Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784+301%Top 19% | 1,943Bottom 13% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 96 %Top 47% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+900% | 5 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,000 mAh+6% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+9% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP54 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 6 years+100% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs HONOR X6cVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs OnePlus N6xVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs realme C63VS