Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
67.3Performance27
81.6Display36.4
58.6Camera41.9
75.5Battery43.7
73.3Features38.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 36.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+45) and performance (+40). Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G)
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $249 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+8% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2340x1080 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+17% | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+350% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| AnTuTu | — | 555,354 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+309%Top 14% | 730Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784+287%Top 19% | 2,010Bottom 18% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+900% | 5 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,000 mAh+6% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g+2% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+13% | 8.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A24 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs OPPO A60VSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs HONOR X6eVSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs Motorola Moto G (2025)VSSamsung Galaxy A24 (4G)vs POCO C85 5GVS