Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
67.3Performance20
81.6Display36
58.6Camera33.1
75.5Battery38.8
73.3Features38.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+47) and display (+46). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+9% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+13% | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+463% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| AnTuTu | — | 260,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+629%Top 14% | 410Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784+490%Top 19% | 1,320Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+150% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,000 mAh+6% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+353% | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g+8% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+14% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVS