Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A35
67.3Performance31.4
81.6Display45.3
58.6Camera41.9
75.5Battery55.7
73.3Features70.7
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+36) and performance (+36). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 31
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 56
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+6% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+19% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+350% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 %+2% | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTu | — | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+184%Top 14% | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784+164%Top 19% | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,000 mAh+6% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h+27% | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g+5% | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS