Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A52
67.3Performance23.1
81.6Display35.6
58.6Camera48.4
75.5Battery39
73.3Features54.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A52
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in display (+46) and performance (+44). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 48
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 55
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+8% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+15% | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+463% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 720G |
| AnTuTu | — | 395,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+309%Top 14% | 730Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784+310%Top 19% | 1,900Bottom 12% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+167% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128GB / 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh+4% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+14% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme C75VSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Huawei P30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme 14x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Redmi 17C 5GVS