Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
67.3Performance45.6
81.6Display58.3
58.6Camera42.1
75.5Battery36.9
73.3Features94.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+39) and display (+23). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 46
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 37
- 400% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 133% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 3 years
- Lower launch price: $900 vs $1,300
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+4% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1080x2640 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+9% | 426 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+73% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+46%Top 14% | 2,044Top 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784+15%Top 19% | 6,761Top 26% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+400% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh+18% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 68 W+172% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W+100% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+52% | 14.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Google Pixel 8aVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs POCO X7VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Samsung Galaxy F55 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)VS