Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
67.3Performance28.9
81.6Display73
58.6Camera34.1
75.5Battery62.4
73.3Features49.3
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra3 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 70.7 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+38) and camera (+25). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 73
- Stronger camera score: 59 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 76 vs 62
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G
- 19% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
- 11% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.2 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+3% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1224x2720 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+5% | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | 87.7 %+2% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987Top 14% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784Top 19% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,600 mAh+19% |
| Wired charging | 68 W+13% | 60 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 6.4 mm+11% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 (HiOS 16.2) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Honor 90VSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVS