Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs vivo X200 Pro mini
67.3Performance71.3
81.6Display73.8
58.6Camera65.5
75.5Battery74.7
73.3Features86.7
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra5 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 70.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+13) and camera (+7). Motorola Razr 60 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 74
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 15% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,987 vs 2,589
- 12% lower thickness: 7.2 mm vs 8.2 mm
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 59
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
- 32% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 68 W
- 21% higher capacity: 5,700 mAh vs 4,700 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+11% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+1% | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | 90.5 %+5% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987+15%Top 14% | 2,589Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784Top 19% | 8,078+4%Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 5,700 mAh+21% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS