Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300
67.3Performance85.4
81.6Display73.5
58.6Camera78.1
75.5Battery87.2
73.3Features84
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr 60 Ultra10 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 70.7, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+19) and performance (+18). Motorola Razr 60 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 74
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 11% higher Screen size: 7 ″ vs 6.31 ″
- 10% lower thickness: 7.2 mm vs 8 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 76
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7 ″+11% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi+1% | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 86.2 % | 90.1 %+5% |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,416,530 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,987Top 14% | 3,446+15%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,784Top 19% | 9,843+26%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,700 mAh | 6,040 mAh+29% |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 90 W+32% |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 40 W+33% |
| Active use endurance | 15.2 h | 17.5 h+15% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm+10% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Mate 80 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs iPhone 18 ProVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs OPPO Find X10 EVSMotorola Razr 60 Ultravs Huawei Pura X ViewVSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS

