Motorola Razr 60 vs Samsung Galaxy A35
22.1Performance31.4
58.2Display45.3
47Camera41.9
44.4Battery55.7
73.3Features70.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr 602 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr 60 scores 43.9 against 45.1 for Samsung Galaxy A35. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy A35 edges ahead in battery and performance, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60
- Stronger display score: 58 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 47 vs 42
- 200% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
- 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
- 63% higher ultra-wide: 13 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- Stronger performance score: 31 vs 22
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 44
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
- 11% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $700
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+6% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 85.3 % | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7400X | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTu | — | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,087+4%Bottom 41% | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,081+4%Bottom 42% | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.79 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh+11% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+10% | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |