Motorola Razr 60 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
22.1Performance29.1
58.2Display55.1
47Camera56.4
44.4Battery41.7
73.3Features73.3
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr 603 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 46.7 to 43.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+9) and performance (+7). Motorola Razr 60 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr 60
- Stronger display score: 58 vs 55
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 100% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,500 nits
- 21% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,087 vs 900
- 20% higher Wired charging: 30 W vs 25 W
- Lower launch price: $700 vs $1,299
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 22
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 47
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 20% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 413 ppi
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 496 ppi+20% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+100% | 1,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 85.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 7400X | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,087+21%Bottom 41% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,081+16%Bottom 42% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.79 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 13 MP+8% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+10% | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+10% | 8.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr 60 | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr 60vs AGM X7 ProVSMotorola Razr 60vs realme 12 5GVSMotorola Razr 60vs iPhone 13VSMotorola Razr 60vs Moto G55 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS