Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

WINNER
Motorola Razr Fold

Motorola

Motorola Razr Fold

$1,900

74Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
67.3Performance20
77.2Display36
65.5Camera33.1
79.3Battery38.8
94.7Features38.7
17 spec wins — Motorola Razr Fold3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr Fold wins this phone face-off, 74 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+56) and performance (+47). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Fold

  • Stronger performance score: 67 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 77 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 79 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 24% lower weight: 184 g vs 243 g
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
  • Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,900

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Screen size8.1 ″+27%6.4 ″
Panel typeLTPO pOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2484x22322400x1080
Pixel density412 ppi411 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness6,200 nits+675%800 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 5MediaTek Helio G80
AnTuTu—260,000
Geekbench 6 (single)2,609+536%Top 20%410Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,915+575%Top 15%1,320Bottom 2%
Wild Life Extreme stability82 %Bottom 49%—
RAM (max)16 GB+167%6 GB
Storage options512GB64GB / 128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Main camera50 MP64 MP+28%
Main aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+60%20 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Capacity6,000 mAh+20%5,000 mAh
Wired charging80 W+433%15 W
Wireless charging50 W—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Weight243 g184 g+24%
Thickness4.6 mm+45%8.4 mm
IP ratingIP49—
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 11 (One UI 3.1)
OS update pledge7 years+75%4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr Fold versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecMotorola Razr FoldSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup