Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
67.3Performance29.1
77.2Display55.1
65.5Camera56.4
79.3Battery41.7
94.7Features73.3
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Fold4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Fold wins this phone face-off, 74 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+38) and battery (+38). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Fold
- Stronger performance score: 67 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 77 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 79 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- 20% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 412 ppi
- 14% lower weight: 208 g vs 243 g
- Lower launch price: $1,299 vs $1,900
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8.1 ″+17% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO pOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2484x2232 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 412 ppi | 496 ppi+20% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,200 nits+313% | 1,500 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,609+190%Top 20% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,915+236%Top 15% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 82 %Bottom 49% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 5 x+67% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+33% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 243 g | 208 g+14% |
| Thickness | 4.6 mm+43% | 8.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP49 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+133% | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Foldvs Huawei Pura 90 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Foldvs OPPO Find X9sVSMotorola Razr Foldvs RedMagic 10 ProVSMotorola Razr Foldvs Xiaomi 15T ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS