Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
67.3Performance65.6
77.2Display57.5
65.5Camera44.1
79.3Battery47.3
94.7Features94.7
13 spec wins — Motorola Razr Fold1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr Fold wins this phone face-off, 74 to 58.9, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+32) and camera (+21). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr Fold
- Stronger display score: 77 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 44
- Stronger battery score: 79 vs 47
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 233% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 15 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
- 23% lower weight: 188 g vs 243 g
- Lower launch price: $1,100 vs $1,900
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8.1 ″+17% | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO pOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 2484x2232 | 1080x2520 |
| Pixel density | 412 ppi+4% | 397 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,200 nits+138% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 88 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,050,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,609+11%Top 20% | 2,350Top 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,915+9%Top 15% | 8,200Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 82 %Bottom 49% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3 x+50% | 2 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+40% | 4,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+233% | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 243 g | 188 g+23% |
| Thickness | 4.6 mm+66% | 13.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP49 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr Foldvs Huawei Pura 90 Pro MaxVSMotorola Razr Foldvs OPPO Find X9sVSMotorola Razr Foldvs RedMagic 10 ProVSMotorola Razr Foldvs Xiaomi 15T ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs OnePlus Nord 5VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs HONOR 600 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs Sony Xperia 1 VIIIVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7vs HONOR X9e ProVS