Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
40.5Performance20
74Display36
54.8Camera33.1
50.4Battery38.8
100Features38.7
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+61) and display (+38). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 41 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 50 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 39
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 11% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,100
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+8% | 6.4 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi+1% | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+83% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| AnTuTu | — | 260,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921+369%Top 37% | 410Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833+266%Top 40% | 1,320Bottom 2% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 64GB / 128GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+60% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh+11% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+200% | 15 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 184 g+3% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+16% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | — |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Infinix SMART 9VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs realme Note 70VSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVS