Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A55
40.5Performance37.9
74Display46.1
54.8Camera46.8
50.4Battery52.7
100Features78.7
11 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A55
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 48.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+28) and features (+21). Samsung Galaxy A55 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 79
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 200% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A55
- 11% higher capacity: 5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- Lower launch price: $449 vs $1,100
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi+6% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 85.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
| AnTuTu | — | 997,950Bottom 40% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 353,082Bottom 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 224,206Bottom 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 162,521Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 258,141Bottom 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921+67%Top 37% | 1,150Bottom 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833+42%Top 40% | 3,400Bottom 48% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh+11% |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+11% | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+14% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs OPPO F33 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs Redmi Note 13 Pro (4G)VSSamsung Galaxy A55vs iQOO Z9x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+VS