Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
40.5Performance29.1
74Display55.1
54.8Camera56.4
50.4Battery41.7
100Features73.3
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and display (+19). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 41 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 50 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- Lower launch price: $1,100 vs $1,299
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 20% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 414 ppi
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 496 ppi+20% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+100% | 1,500 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921+113%Top 37% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833+82%Top 40% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+9% | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+12% | 8.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS