Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
40.5Performance29.1
74Display54
54.8Camera65.9
50.4Battery55.1
100Features73.3
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and display (+20). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 41 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 54
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 150% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,200 nits
- Lower launch price: $1,100 vs $1,399
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 55 vs 50
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 25% higher Front camera: 40 MP vs 32 MP
- 23% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 414 ppi
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 511 ppi+23% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+150% | 1,200 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921+113%Top 37% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833+82%Top 40% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 4 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh+11% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+15% | 222 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+19% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 10 (One UI 2) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VS