Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S24+
40.5Performance61.1
74Display66.7
54.8Camera47.3
50.4Battery62.3
100Features94.7
7 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S24+
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S24+ wins this phone face-off, 63 to 58, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+21) and battery (+12). Motorola Razr+ (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 67
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Stronger performance score: 61 vs 41
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 50
- 43% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,900 vs 4,833
- 24% higher Pixel density: 513 ppi vs 414 ppi
- 17% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,250 vs 1,921
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1440x3120 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 513 ppi+24% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 2,250+17%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 6,900+43%Top 24% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,900 mAh+9% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+4% | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+8% | 7.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs REDMI Note 17 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Honor X80 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Asus ROG Phone 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24+vs Huawei Mate 70 ProVS