Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S25
40.5Performance75.3
74Display61.3
54.8Camera47.3
50.4Battery51.4
100Features94.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 wins this phone face-off, 64.1 to 58, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+35) and battery (+1). Motorola Razr+ (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 61
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 41
- 94% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 9,400 vs 4,833
- 54% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 1,921
- 14% lower weight: 162 g vs 189 g
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,100
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+11% | 6.2 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,578,555Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 792,959Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 925,248Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 331,698Top 33% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 528,650Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 2,950+54%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 9,400+94%Top 12% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh+13% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 162 g+14% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+2% | 7.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S25 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs Huawei Pura 90 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus 15RVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus 13sVSSamsung Galaxy S25vs OnePlus Turbo 6X ProVS