Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
40.5Performance45.6
74Display58.3
54.8Camera42.1
50.4Battery36.9
100Features94.7
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 50.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+16) and battery (+14). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 50 vs 37
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Stronger performance score: 46 vs 41
- 40% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,761 vs 4,833
- Lower launch price: $900 vs $1,100
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1080x2640 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 426 ppi+3% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 2,044+6%Top 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 6,761+40%Top 26% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh+13% | 4,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g+1% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+52% | 14.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Google Pixel 8aVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs POCO X7VSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Samsung Galaxy F55 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FEvs Redmi Note 14 Pro (4G)VS