Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
40.5Performance75.8
74Display58.4
54.8Camera55.7
50.4Battery47.9
100Features94.7
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 wins this phone face-off, 64.6 to 58, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+35) and camera (+1). Motorola Razr+ (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 58
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
- Lower launch price: $1,100 vs $2,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Stronger performance score: 76 vs 41
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 92% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 9,300 vs 4,833
- 54% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 1,921
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 8 ″+16% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1968x2184 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi+13% | 368 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,250,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 2,950+54%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 9,300+92%Top 12% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh+2% | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+12% | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+20% | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs HONOR X9dVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs iPhone DuoVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5GVS