Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
40.5Performance25.9
74Display75.9
54.8Camera60.5
50.4Battery66.6
100Features73.3
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)3 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 55.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and performance (+15). TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 41 vs 26
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 82% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,921 vs 1,057
- 54% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,833 vs 3,148
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 50
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 44% higher capacity: 6,500 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 429 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921+82%Top 37% | 1,057Bottom 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833+54%Top 40% | 3,148Bottom 43% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,500 mAh+44% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+9% | 7.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs POCO M8 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs HONOR X60 ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs iQOO Z11SVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs vivo T4 ProVS