Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Tecno Camon Slim 4G
40.5Performance28.9
74Display73
54.8Camera34.1
50.4Battery62.4
100Features49.3
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in features (+51) and camera (+21). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 41 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 34
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 49
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 50
- 33% higher Wired charging: 60 W vs 45 W
- 24% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- 10% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.1 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1224x2720 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 440 ppi+6% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 87.7 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,600 mAh+24% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 60 W+33% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.4 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (HiOS 16.2) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Tecno Camon Slim 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Honor 90VSTecno Camon Slim 4Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVS