Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
40.5Performance28.9
74Display74.2
54.8Camera45.9
50.4Battery61.9
100Features65.3
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)4 spec wins — TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr+ (2026) wins this phone face-off, 58 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and performance (+12). TECNO CAMON Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger performance score: 41 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 46
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 65
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 50
- 33% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh
- 10% lower weight: 171 g vs 189 g
- 10% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 7.1 mm
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 429 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh+33% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g | 171 g+10% |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 6.4 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69K |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs POCO F6VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs REDMI Note 15 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A56VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs iPhone 14 ProVS