Motorola Razr+ (2026) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
40.5Performance93.3
74Display82.3
54.8Camera84.6
50.4Battery91.5
100Features84
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr+ (2026)10 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 58, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+53) and battery (+41). Motorola Razr+ (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr+ (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
- 19% lower weight: 189 g vs 232 g
- 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- 13% lower thickness: 7.1 mm vs 8.2 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 41
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 74
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 50
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+1% | 6.82 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 414 ppi | 510 ppi+23% |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+15% | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | — | 4,085,695 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,921Top 37% | 3,730+94%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,833Top 40% | 11,494+138%Top 3% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 53 %Bottom 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,600 mAh+47% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W+122% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 16 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+19% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm+13% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | — | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr+ (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr+ (2026)vs OnePlus Nord 4VSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs POCO F7 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs Xiaomi 12 ProVSMotorola Razr+ (2026)vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5GVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS