Skip to content
InnoReviews

CMF Phone 2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

CMF Phone 2 Pro

Nothing

CMF Phone 2 Pro

$279

40.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
21.8Performance93.3
58.6Display82.3
39.4Camera84.6
47.8Battery91.5
49.3Features84
2 spec wins — CMF Phone 2 Pro18 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 40.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+72) and camera (+45). CMF Phone 2 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the CMF Phone 2 Pro

  • 20% lower weight: 185 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 22
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 59
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 39
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 48
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 49

Display

Display comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.77 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1084x23921440x3168
Pixel density387 ppi510 ppi+32%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness3,000 nits4,500 nits+50%
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)1,016Bottom 33%3,730+267%Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,961Bottom 39%11,494+288%Top 3%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128GB/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.88f/1.9
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom2 x3.7 x+85%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera16 MP50 MP+213%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,600 mAh+32%
Wired charging33 W100 W+203%
Wireless charging0 W40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Weight185 g+20%232 g
Thickness7.8 mm+5%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 15 (Nothing OS 3.2)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: CMF Phone 2 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecCMF Phone 2 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup