OPPO Find X9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A35
84.6Performance31.4
72.2Display45.3
74.4Camera41.9
92.9Battery55.7
84Features70.7
16 spec wins — OPPO Find X9 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Find X9 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.7 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+53) and battery (+37). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Find X9 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 31
- Stronger display score: 72 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 93 vs 56
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 71
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Display
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″+3% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi+15% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+260% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 95.5 %+12% | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 3,563,384 | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,320+216%Top 8% | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,697+229%Top 10% | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3 x+200% | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@120fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+285% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,500 mAh+50% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | 22 h+83% | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 224 g | 209 g+7% |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm | 8.2 mm+1% |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP67 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | 5 years+25% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
OPPO Find X9 Provs Vivo X300VSOPPO Find X9 Provs OnePlus 15VSOPPO Find X9 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSOPPO Find X9 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS