OPPO Find X9 Ultra vs Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
91.2Performance55.2
81Display53.7
83.2Camera46.8
95Battery94.7
84Features60
12 spec wins — OPPO Find X9 Ultra3 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
OPPO Find X9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 87.6 to 61.6, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+36) and performance (+36). Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the OPPO Find X9 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 91 vs 55
- Stronger display score: 81 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 83 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 60
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- 50% higher capacity: 10,600 mAh vs 7,050 mAh
- 20% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 100 W
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.82 ″+2% | 6.67 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1080x2400 |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi+29% | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits+64% | 2,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 94.6 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ |
| AnTuTu | 4,110,112 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,626+68%Top 4% | 2,158Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,895+54%Top 4% | 7,082Top 22% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 40 %Bottom 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,050 mAh | 10,600 mAh+50% |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 120 W+20% |
| Wireless charging | 50 W | 50 W |
| Active use endurance | 20.2 h | — |
Design
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 235 g+48% | 450 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm+55% | 19.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Aluminum | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (ColorOS 16) | Android 14 |
| OS update pledge | 5 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | OPPO Find X9 Ultra | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
OPPO Find X9 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSOPPO Find X9 Ultravs Vivo X300 UltraVSOPPO Find X9 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSOPPO Find X9 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iPhone AirVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Huawei Mate XT Ultimate DesignVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iQOO Z9 TurboVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraVS